Feds cast doubt on benefits of vitamin D supplements

Story by Jennifer LaRue Huget
(Special to The Washington Post)
Fri, Jun 22, 2012
Share this

We keep hearing that Vitamin D is great for our health. So what to make of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force’s report last week that most of us shouldn’t take Vitamin D supplements, at least not if we’re trying to prevent cancer or bone fractures?

The task force issued a draft recommendation based on its review of the scientific literature. Using the customary plain language of evidence-based science, the report (and its consumer-friendly summary) finds, in short: “For cancer, the Task Force found there isn’t enough information to say whether supplements can prevent cancer. For fractures, the science tells us there is no benefit in taking vitamin D and calcium supplements at low doses to prevent fractures in post-menopausal women. There isn’t enough information to say whether the supplements prevent fractures in men and in premenopausal women, or whether they prevent fractures in post-menopausal women if taken in higher doses.”

In light of those findings, even the relatively small risk of kidney stones that supplementation with 400 International Units of Vitamin D and 1,000 milligrams of calcium a day poses is viewed as outweighing any potential benefits.

However, the draft recommendation notes that there’s evidence that taking Vitamin D supplements can help people older than 65 who are at increased risk of falling. Since many fractures result from falls, Vitamin D supplements may be seen as indirectly contributing to reduced fracture risk.

The Institute of Medicine issued a report in November 2010 saying adults should consume 600 IU of Vitamin D (800 IU for those older than 70) and 1,000 to 1,300 milligrams of calcium daily.

The task force’s draft recommendations are open to public comment through July 10.

blog comments powered by Disqus